Ignoring Mark Driscoll

I may have said that when I write I have in mind what people want to read and that effects what makes into on the page. But some people take it a whole lot further.

Writing to meet your readers’ demands is one thing. Writing to provoke a response can have its place. Even courting a bit of controversy to get people thinking can be accepted.

But there is a line. We could probably even select a passage of scripture and create a grid of what we should and shouldn’t do. Maybe along the lines of what is permissible under the law, and what is helpful. I can see the attraction in that sort of approach, it would help us know where we stand. What is fine and what is beyond the pale.

Because someone who belittles men because of their personality or effeminate manner shouldn’t be paraded as a hero.

And hopefully we can agree that advocating fighting as an expression of Christianity is not the best way of imitating the suffering saviour.

Surely we can see that a book about marriage should have at it’s centre the model of Christ and the church. But instead spends too much time in crude, reductionist, interpretations of scripture.

Without a doubt we should know that encouraging a nation to intentionally raise up celebrity pastors is a step in the wrong direction.

Because when these sort of messages are pushed it harms the church. When these things are said it cannot just be accounted for and excused by looking to the following the author and speaker has, or the size of his congregation, or his place in the Amazon best seller charts.

It is not enough to say that because someone is popular and have had success in building a church they should be given license to say what they like.

It is nonsense to say that certain messages are necessary because men are leaving the church. The problem is not solved by taking lessons from the worst parts of a consumer driven, sex obsessed, violence glorifying, celebrity culture.

When such things are said by people with a following it is even more urgent that they are not allowed to get away with it. That they are corrected, and rebuked, and then in the future ignored. No more invitations to conferences, or interviews in magazines – then trailed to increase publicity, building second hand on his penchant for the controversial. Just left alone.

Maybe I should just man up, get on a flight to Seattle and pull him into the car park and smack him down. He’d probably have some respect for me if I did that.

But that would miss the point, because that’s not how I work, or who I am. Instead I’m just a granny in her pyjamas writing behind the invisible walls of the internet.

I’m not going to call anyone out in a fight to prove I’m right, after all, I’m not always sure I am right, especially about all this. If I’m wrong I’m sure Pastor Mark will be happy to help me out.

My hypocrisy evidenced in this post is duly noted.

12 thoughts on “Ignoring Mark Driscoll

  1. Fantastic post, couldn’t agree with you more. Christianity is about relationship not celebrity and fame. I’d rathe have twelve people who were in love with od in my congregation than a thousand who were simply following me. May god bless you

  2. Please provide a link to the article you wrote, so those hearing the debate just now can understand it in context. I would ask Mark to do the same, but apparently he doesn’t want you to get enough advert revenue to be able to fly to Seattle.

  3. Thank you Danny as always for sharing a controversial topic. I have to say I am a Mark Driscoll fan, but don’t always agree with everything he says. I would be foolish to!

    However, I was disappointed to read the latest blog post Titled “A Blog For the Brits”. He is making a sweeping generalisation on a number of different subjects and I’m missing the point he is trying to make if i am being entirely honest. Don’t even get me started on the line about Ireland! [as well as Scotland and England] (back off Driscoll!)

    The last paragraph ; “It’s All about Jesus”

    “In the providence of God, I trust everything will sort itself out in time. The best thing is to not waste time blogging, twittering, and talking about me. I was not born of a virgin, have not lived without sin, and am not going to judge the living and the dead. Jesus is all that matters.”

    Just goes to show that he has judged the living, and the dead with the post in the first place. Yes everyone is entitled to their opinion, but who gave him authority to state that his opinion is “fact” – IT IS JUST HIS OPINION which he tries to back up with facts about who Jesus is. Also why should we stop blogging about him when he blogs about himself?

    This comment is probably too long, but it is a good outlet for me to rant!

Add your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s